Healthcare Staffing Agencies and Affordable Care Act: A Taxing Issue

Posted by Tim Teague on 10/29/14 11:30 AM

Many healthcare staffing agencies that have over 50 FTEs are looking at the cost (or Tax) associated with NOT complying with the Affordable Care Act.  In 2015, employers with more than 100 FTEs will need to cover 70% of their full-time employees and by 2016 employers with more than 50 FTEs will have to cover substantially all employees, (95% with margin of error of 5%). 


tax_calculatorThe annual fee for non-compliance is $2,000 on an annual basis, but it is actually calculated on a month-to-month basis for employers. The fee could rise to $3,000 if at least one employee receives a premium tax credit because employer coverage is not affordable or employer coverage does not cover at least 60% of total healthcare costs.

There is only one possibility that there will be no penalty (tax) for any company with over 50 FTEs that does NOT offer any health insurance; no employee receives a premium tax credit or cost-sharing subsidy in an Exchange. When considering all the possibilities for 50 + employees, the likelihood is very small that not one employee would receive a tax credit, or cost sharing subsidy.

Here are the balance of the possible combinations and their impact:

Employer of over 50 FTES does not offer health coverage and at least one (1) employee receives a premium tax credit or cost-sharing subsides

Result:

Penalty of $2,000 per year times the number of FTEs over 30. (i.e. 60 FTEs would result in a penalty of $2,000 for employees # 31 to 60, or $60,000.

Employer of over 50 FTEs offers health coverage

Result:

If the insurance does not cover at least 60% of the covered healthcare expenses of a typical population, then the penalty will be $3,000 per employee that receives a tax credit as a result of the disqualified employer insurance. (this penalty cannot exceed $2,000 times the number of FTEs over 30.) i.e. total FTEs =75, then limit would be $2,000 for FTEs 31 to 75, or $90,000. Since $90,000 is the cap, the $3,000 penalty could only apply to the first 30 FTEs that received a tax credit. 


If the insurance DOES provide coverage for at least 60% of covered healthcare expenses but it requires a payment of more than 9.5% of the family income for the employer coverage, then the penalty will be $3,000 per employee that receives a tax credit as a result of the disqualified employer insurance. (this penalty cannot exceed $2,000 times the number of FTEs over 30.) i.e. total FTEs =75, then limit would be $2,000 for FTEs 31 to 75, or $90,000. Since $90,000 is the cap, the $3,000 penalty could only apply to the first 30 FTEs that received a tax credit.

If the employer-offered coverage provides at least 60% coverage as in (a) above, and does not cost more than 9.5% of annual FTE income, then there is no penalty for the employer.

Despite this relative straightforward explanation, there are sure to be grey areas in defining 60% coverage in specific markets, as well as some further explanation on the 9.5% of total family income.

Recent Posts


Join Our Newsletter

Please complete this form to receive insights on healthcare workforce management trends, BlueSky product announcements, recruiter tips and tricks, and more.
  *
 *
 *
*
*Required Fields
clinical workforce management software

BlueSky Medical Staffing Software is an applicant tracking system, vendor management system, staff/nurse scheduling system, and invoice/payroll tool combined into one suite for clinical talent and contingent labor management. BlueSky has been empowering the healthcare and hospital staffing industry for over twenty years by solving expensive operational problems in business and organizations.

BlueSky is the only staffing software available on the market today that is healthcare specific, accommodates full lifecycle recruitment, front-to-back-office workflows, medical credential management, vendor management, workflow automation, and more.

Schedule a Live Demo.

Request a live demo from one of our team members.

Book Now